Friday,
June 13, 2008 at 5:55am
I have this view on life that’s
pretty simple. Be happy. The only reason I’m so good at being happy
is because I learn what I have to in order to see things simply. I’m
going to try to apply this simple outlook to the major problems of
the world and see if I can make them sound reasonable.
Global
warming: the fact is we screwed up in how we decided run our cars and
get our energy. Simple minded me says use solar panels, on
everything. Hydrogen and water engines either exist or are at the
brink of existing so replace or modify every old engine to be like
them. The wind is free so put wind farms in all that grass next to
fields. Flowing water turning wheels can power lights in cities, and
does for some. Why isn’t it happening? People like to bark about
the cost and I just want to say “look, if the atmosphere goes,
everything on the planet does to.” McCain is talking about
investing in nuclear power. There are worse problems with that than
any of the methods listed, and considering he’s just Bush light I
wonder how long it would take for that to turn into more weapons.
From our intervention to the utilization of fungus and different
bacteria we could deal with this seemingly overnight, yet the
collective brainpower of some of the smartest people on the planet is
not getting filtered fast enough into what I consider good enough
results. (Edit: I have since rescinded my view on nuclear power and
didn’t realize how many missiles were being
decommissioned.)
Violence: Now even though historically
violence is less than it ever has been, it is never going to be low
enough for people living in gang areas or in warring countries. City
and gang violence I say do the following. Go in with a massive task
force and put them down before they can shoot anymore bystanders. We
already see how this works in Iraq. More troops equals less violence.
When your neighborhood has been gangster cleansed how many young
recruits are going to look at the body pile and think twice about
fucking with armored cavalry? I’m not a big fan of violence, but I
say fuck them if they choose to be willfully ignorant about the, what
would then be known consequence, of continuing down said path. Those
fanatics who perpetuate war in other countries, massive world effort
to save as many of the innocent as possible, then bomb the shit out
of what’s left. Given people are content enough today with
collateral damage, I’m at least proposing we move who we can out
before the demolition.
Poverty: All those damn poor people.
While I think a lot of it is their fault, I’m well aware there are
plenty of people who are hard working and are still struggling like
crazy. For those super poor street living people, take them to jail.
I have a plan for them after they are there too, just wait. Those
with meager incomes and huge families will take a little more work.
First, if Jethro wants to have 17 kids and live in a shack, he’s
getting a vasectomy. The kids will go to half way homes, again
something I have a plan for. Not quite a jail yet not really freedom
will be learning centers for these types of people. If all you know
is how to work on cars, that will change quickly.
I feel I
should take a moment to say, this is not a democracy. People will
feel as if they’re civil liberties are in jeopardy and their
freedom is being violated and all I can say to that is, your feelings
are wrong. It has become overly apparent to me that people do not
know what is best for themselves. They know how to survive and how to
get along very-semi-well enough, but long term prospects for humanity
look ever dim. That is my focus. No one gets hurt unless they choose
to play that game. No one stays dumb or they don’t eat. Simple
enough.
Jails: Most already do this, but I don’t feel it is
to the extent of maximal gain. Everyone works. And I don’t mean
license plates. I mean they are working like Mexicans to work on any
and every task that can be taught for the better of the surrounding
area. Those death row and lifers will be put to the task of learning
the more complicated aspects of the current global problems, and will
become extra brainpower focused on subject. Not like they don’t
have the time. Those learning centers will be slightly less freedom
invasive, but the expectations will in no way be lax. People will
become smarter or they won’t eat. I think food is a big enough
motivation for anybody to do what it is that is required of them.
Those that are mentally incapable of doing such will not starve to
death if I may quell any sudden outcries of cruelty.
Those
halfway houses: The condition they are in today is atrocious. Kids
just kind of existing with other kids in rundown shacks with
overseers. My facilities would again be education oriented. Kids will
be treated like they aren’t retarded and if they behave as such,
that food thing kicks in. Minor debate can be held about the
appropriate age to implement that. Parents can see and contact their
kids, and when they show they’ve become smart/responsible enough,
they can be reunited.
I think I should take another moment to
talk about money. That’s the excuse over and over when regarding
anything, absolutely anything that is new or different. I have this
philosophy. If you can do a job, you can do it without money. Simple?
Where’s the incentive you ask? Intellectual gain, food, aesthetic
enjoyment, and freedom. I think there are enough people that
appreciate doing something because they love to do it. Many doctors
and teachers are not getting paid as much as some would think they
should, but the job gets done anyway. Money for the bills is the
concern. But the bills will be dealt with another way. Money for
food, clothes, etc. which again won’t be an issue. Sooner or later
people will learn to adopt that they get what they put into the
welfare of humanity. This will only work mind you when enough people
are contributing to the overwhelming basin of goodies for all.
Someone somewhere has something you want/need and the same can be
said about you. Being able to make those connections and understand
the power of connectivity will be what frees people from thinking
they are at the will of bills and must cling desperately to meager
rewards.
Time: I spend a lot of time doing nothing. I
recognize this to be a problem so how time is broken up will be
another aspect of this. A number of hours will be devoted each day to
reading. It doesn’t matter what people read, but one thing must be
science oriented per week. In Spain everyone stops what they’re
doing midday to just chill, why can’t we read?
I should make
a note of my inspiration for this digression. First, Bee Movie which
shows you how integral a seemingly pointless job that millions of
others are doing is truly important to the whole. Second, watching
ants which again falls close to the same concept. Third, my never
ending fear that people will never understand whatever it is they
want well enough to be happy. And forth, thinking about the types of
civilizations Michio Kaku, theoretical physicist at U. of New York,
has discussed.
Human interaction: Obviously people still get
worked up about racism, curse words, etc. And those aren’t likely
to go away. My approach is to use any curse worse, racial terms,
taboo statement until they become boring. If I can say fuck instead
of uh…, like, or umm and not even realize that it’s a “curse”
word, I’m sure people can become just as desensitized to the stupid
little things in language that cause such big issues. After that
nappy headed hoes comment, It should have been played as often as
Love Song by Sara Barreiles until people thought of the phrase to the
same extent they contemplate “cat.” I don’t think words matter
in any aspect removed from the actions they evoke from people. Take
away the compulsory response, avoid the negative action.
Sexuality:
People will learn to not be sexually repressed. In other countries
people are either fucking in public or putting boobs in orange juice
commercials. I think an insurmountable amount of stress comes from
people who cannot express themselves in frankly perverted and touchy
feely ways. This doesn’t mean it will be okay to just grope whoever
walks by and slap people in the face with your dick. This does mean
though that one night stands might be discussed over coffee or amidst
some social gathering and a quickie in the break room won’t get you
fired. When the air is clear to think, feel, and express those animal
urges is out of the way, more time can be focused on more
“productive” things. And obviously measures in contraceptives
will take on a whole new light and sex education will be
everywhere.
Drugs and alcohol: Legalize and prepare. Like with
the cussing and racist crap, when its legal, the rush of being the
badass breaking the rules goes away. Those that are truly addicted
can get stipends, but will not be allowed to snort themselves into a
coma. If you are going to drink, assuming the car is still the most
prevalent way to transport people, there will be built in
breathalyzers that disable the car from moving if your that impaired.
Those things even exist already. Otherwise, drunk people walking or
making noise are far less of a nuisance than dead people. Controlled
environments can be set up for people wanting to “experiment.”
Religion: Will be dealt with as any other social
organization. The second it becomes a hindrance to education or a
threat, it will be obliterated. When a bill in, let’s say
Louisiana, even hints of creationism in the classroom, those people
will be thoroughly reconditioned. I can only say I don’t care what
you believe as long as you do in fact believe a list of other things
right alongside it. When a contradiction arises and you don’t make
way to logical fact, you’ve given yourself an issue my system will
be forced to deal with.
Now with anything, there will be
cheaters and under-minors. Not everything can be dealt with without
totalitarian fear and an all seeing eye. The whole point of having a
system designed to provide ease of information and progress is to
teach people that they literally are only hurting themselves when
everyone else is playing along. This is not how it works in our
society. Those that cheat win bigger than ever. Those that play the
right kind of “game” in a given situation will have it pay out.
Only when your about someone else’s well being can you understand
what it does for your own. Having a planet to live on, being able to
trust people to be smart enough to make good decisions, and utilizing
the untapped potential of the idle human being are on my list of
things important to a master race.
|
There are a
lot of good ideas in that note, all we need is a dictator who
would put this into effect. |
Report
- Delete |
|
|
You do have
some verrry strong points Nick. It sometimes comes across as
a little dictator-esque, HOWEVER, as you said, we don't
honestly live in democratic nation. Overall, though, sounds
like a plan to me! |
Report
- Delete |
|
|
Billy
Bowman
(Bloomington, IN) wroteat
2:17pm on June 13th, 2008
Interesting
solutions.. i like them. No way they would work with our
current government though..... |
Report
- Delete |
|
|
Brian
Morrow
(Indiana State) wroteat
3:26pm on June 13th, 2008
Thanks for
the 23% tax hike and pissing all over civil liberties... So
much of this is just impossible! Just wait until I get to a
computer... and you do know that lower-class culture is self
perpetuating, right? |
Report
- Delete |
|
|
BJ, I would
glad pay a 23% tax high to fix the worlds problem. Hell I'd
give a full years salary to fix all the world's problem. These
solutions are not impossible, not feasible maybe. If only I was
dictator of the world,lol. |
Report
- Delete |
|
|
Billy
Bowman
(Bloomington, IN) wroteat
3:56pm on June 13th, 2008
Psh.. if we
eliminated congress we wouldn't have to have any tax hike at
ALL... we may actually be able to cut taxes.... |
Report
- Delete |
|
|
Matt
Bane
(Taylor IN) wroteat
7:24pm on June 13th, 2008
Hey, you
would fix all the worlds problems with this plan right? You
say at one point in this rant that people don't know what's
best for them, and that they are only good at surviving, but
you go on to make a set of changes that would take away their
right and ability to live their own lives, make mistakes, and
have the freedom to be their own person (which is what they are
the way the world is now, flawed as it is, PEOPLE- Human beings
with emotions and thoughts and opinions) in order to solve
global warming and war and other problems. So basically you
would take away everything that makes life worth living to
ensure that people would get to just survive. |
Report
- Delete |
|
|
Matt
Bane
(Taylor IN) wroteat
7:24pm on June 13th, 2008
Also, a
little side note, with all of my opinions on the ethics of your
ideas aside, I do not believe it would work. You can't just
eliminate violence by exterminating everyone that you deem a
threat. Even if you destroy everyone who "statistically"
is more likely to commit violent crime or "genetically
predisposed" toward violence based on research you would
obviously conduct before cleaning up the streets, there would
still be hate and anger between people that would lead to
violence. While you tear families apart because parents aren't
"smart enough" to raise their kids, the love they
have for each other would lead at least the adults in the
family to resist. |
Report
- Delete |
|
|
Matt
Bane
(Taylor IN) wroteat
7:26pm on June 13th, 2008
But you
could always just invent some drug that eliminates all human
emotion... we'd be better off without those damn brutish animal
impulses after all wouldn't we? Then everyone would mindlessly
obey and mankinds problems would be over, global warming would
end, we would all survive. But at the cost of everything that
makes us people and makes life worth living. You'd eb alive but
never love a woman, never know the joy of fathering a child,
and never create anything meaningful that you take any pride
in. So thanks for ending the world's problems... |
Report
- Delete |
|
|
Nick
P.
wroteat
7:47pm on June 13th, 2008
Matt, this
is a preliminary set up of a much grander scheme. The whole
point of this plan is to show people that they aren't living
their own lives. They are living as slaves to money,
governmental control, and their untangled emotions. I'm not
taking anything away from those that can prove through their
contributions that they are indeed worthy to give the whole
living freely value. If anything I would provide more reasons
to make life worth living than people could imagine. I don't
think "surviving" entails being some mindless zombie
gear of a machine. I think in order to thrive and secure any
sort of notable existence it will take a massive overhaul on
what we consider the "right" way to be live as.
|
Delete |
|
|
Nick
P.
wroteat
7:53pm on June 13th, 2008
The plan is
not to necessarily eliminate violence either Matt. I think
you'd give me a little more credit about understanding how
people behave. I don't believe there is ever an excuse from a
"genetically predisposed" position because your genes
don't make your decisions. Like I noted, violence is at an all
time low in histories terms, I'm just shooting for as low as it
can get. I don't think you can appreciate the effect really
stupid parents have on their kids. It's not tearing families
apart, its intervening in an all too common negative
phenomenon. Don't get me started on what people consider "love"
to be, especially in a dramatic family situation. To that I
could only say again, your feelings wouldn't matter. I also
noted that things would go back to normal once they proved they
could take care of them.
|
Delete |
|
|
Nick
P.
wroteat
7:58pm on June 13th, 2008
Drugs that
eliminate human emotion would only detract from what I want
people to get out of life. I rather enjoy my contemptible
animal impulses, and would live a rather meager existence
without them. Global warming ending because people become
zombies? I'm not sure how those ideas are connected. I never
once said people wouldn't feel love, be able to have kids, and
the whole point of the system would be to create as many
meaningful and things to take pride in as possible. I'm glad
you offered a strong negative opinion, but I feel I can either
provide more clarification and/or you just took some points the
wrong way.
|
Delete |
|
|
Brian
Morrow
(Indiana State) wroteat
8:11pm on June 13th, 2008
How the
FUCK would you even survive without money? Please explain that
shit because PEOPLE DON'T BETTER THEMSELVES BY BEING OPPRESSED,
ROBBED, AND DOWNGRADED TO THE STATUS OF THOSE THAT DIDN'T OR
COULDN'T!! |
Report
- Delete |
|
|
Nick
P.
wroteat
8:12pm on June 13th, 2008
Byron and
Bj, again this is due to my lack of being as specific as
possible. This culture would exist in different terms than
taxes/money. No, in today's society, some of the stuff is not
feasible, let alone given the contingencies of our government
before any progress is ever made. When I mean change, I mean
massive change and when people finally "get it" it
will not take a dictator for it to perpetuate. The way our
government is set up now, people piss on their own liberties.
What bigger dick up their ass could the poor ask for when they
voted for Bush? If anything I will be providing people with
more opportunities to get in tuned with what their civil
liberties are, and how to preserve them. You wouldn't have to
be so ballsy in your profession in this society Bj, the things
you want will have a knack for finding you. |
Delete |
|
|
Nick
P.
wroteat
8:18pm on June 13th, 2008
Getting
smarter, providing for overburdened families, and utilizing
those who've chosen to end their own prospects for freedom or
happiness is not oppression. You want to scream the word robbed
at me? Being "forced" to put something towards the
betterment of society is not being downgraded. I said it in the
note. If you can do something, you can do it without payment.
This is a simple fact that green paper does not hinder what I'm
capable of anymore than it does anybody else. You are getting
too caught up in the failings of our current condition and not
letting the potential of what I'm proposing sink in. The
closest I can draw any sort of analogy would be to point you in
the direction of bees or ants. And before I hear any obvious
retorts to that analogy, I would urge you to better inform
yourself about both societies.
|
Delete |
|
|
You're
right it wouldn't neccessiarily take a dictator, just mssive
changes in our own government like you said. If it was up to me
I would make it a dictatorial society, but that's just me (I
would be high up in the food chain mind you, lol). |
Report
- Delete |
|
|
Brian
Morrow
(Indiana State) wroteat
2:50am on June 14th, 2008
Byron,
what's wrong with being low in the food chain? I mean, 100% of
the people (of course the margin of error.) are at the bottom
whenever there is a dictator. What's so bad with getting
bitched out of your liberties? And Nick, what are you doing
right now to contribute to the working poor? Are you growing
food for them, building homes, or knitting some sweaters out of
the kindness of your heart? (LMAO) And people are just going to
give away the wants of society just as they would the needs!? |
Report
- Delete |
|
|
Nick
P.
wroteat
3:07am on June 14th, 2008
Bj you
misunderstand me again. This is my theoretical plan. I'm no
humanitarian and would probably be subject to reconditioning
myself. We all would. The working poor having just one more guy
kind of helping them in our system wouldn't do shit enough in
my opinion and your basically preaching to the point. Knitting
sweaters, as fun as that is, doesn't help me nor them. In
answer to your last question, yes. That is what the systems
goal would be. Who capitalizes from electronics that cost
hundreds less to make than buy? The "stuff" is out
there, how we go about distributing it would be completely new.
I'm not trying to be a martyr for something that people can
barely comprehend at this point. What are you doing to not be
poor? Is that honest or to the benefit of anyone but yourself?
Anyone who argues against this line of reasoning automatically
digs themselves a hypocritical hole. I never claimed to be
above that hole, I'm merely proposing my ideas.
|
Delete |
|
|
Who says
most people would have to bottom of the food chain in dictator
ship. There are many examples of flourishing dictatorships.
South Korea flourished from 1848 threw the 1980's with their
dictators Syngman Rhee, Park Chung-hee, and Chun
Doo-hwan.Singapore also thrived from 1959 to 1990 under Lee
Kuan Yew. And the best example of all is Spain with Fancisco
Franco who was greatly loved and served his country from 1936
to 1975.There are many other benevolent dictators. but whether
I lived in a country with a dictatorship or a democracy I would
still want to be high on the food chain.
|
Report
- Delete |
|
|
Brian
Morrow
(Indiana State) wroteat
2:43pm on June 14th, 2008
I'm doing
what I have to do to survive, that's my fucking point! I don't
rely on shit from anybody else! Just as you say even, people
are in control of their own destiny, and yes, people will fuck
it up for themselves. And you're preaching hypotheticals,
talking as if the system is foolproof like it won't be abused
like some Pokemon cards... It's a dog-eat-dog world and noone's
going to dumb themselves do to be another's worker bee! Haven't
ya'll noticed Survival of the Fittest in nature? GTFO |
Report
- Delete |
|
|
Nick
P.
wroteat
4:20pm on June 14th, 2008
You’re
not making any sense. You don't need cameras and tvs to
survive. Unfortunately people do not realize that they are not
in control of their destinies. I don't know how the system
would be run because we have a world full of people like you
have zero idea how a give a get given society would ever
thrive. You did exactly what I thought you would do and said
people would have to get "dumb" when every last thing
my note is about is getting better informed and better
connected. And again, they wouldn't be doing it for some
dictator, that's Byron's thing, they would be doing it for
themselves keeping the rest of the world in the best possible
shape as a byproduct. It's survival of the best adapted, and we
are obviously not adapted to deal with our many issues both
inner and outer. If you want to preach how awesome being poor
and hopeless we are fine, but stop arguing if you’re not
going to address any of the real points me and Byron have given
you. |
Delete |
|
|
Brian
Morrow
(Indiana State) wroteat
5:02pm on June 14th, 2008
I'm talking
of the differences of wants and needs and it's a giant fucking
gap! You notice how lower class culture spends a good deal of
their earnings on shit they don't need? BTW, the wall fell down
in the eighties, so tell me where the Soviets got it right. In
your hypothetical society of just needs and nobody even
striving for excellence, how will their be progress? What will
be done in the event of disaster/emergency? And you're ready to
give up your possesions, the stuff you had to earn? |
Report
- Delete |
|
|
Nick
P.
wroteat
5:16pm on June 14th, 2008
What the
hell are you talking about? You are arguing against the
complete OPPOSITE of everything this society would stand for.
The entire goal is progress, excellence, if not perfection. In
the event of a disaster why wouldn't we respond the same ways
we do now, but with more people, more focus, and quicker
results. I again, never said ANYTHING about giving up your
possessions and your pulling things out of the air to fight
with me about. I'm not shooting to be a Soviet nor do I know
the spending habits of the poor. Try quoting me or something so
we talk about something I actually said and can back up. |
Delete |
|
|
Bj, I wish
I had the time to write a full response to you but I have to
work. Just to let you know the Soviets were Communist and no
one has even mentioned this form of government in the debate
and I'll tell you were the soviets got it right, they were able
to pull a country that was completely in the shitter in to a
world superpower, that's not to say they did in a perfect way
or even the best way. But they did it none the less. Communism
works well for countries that are in the shiter it stops
working when the country has once again re stabilized and
begins prospering. |
|