Showing posts with label Hypocrisy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hypocrisy. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 28, 2020

[873] Atomic Puzzle

Let’s see what’s going on up there.

I called dispatch on a truck that was driving wrong. He was idling next to another truck in the fast line for what felt like an incredibly long time. We passed emergency vehicles and other hazards on the road for which the truck next to him flipped on his turn signal in trying to get farther away from. He didn’t budge. I told dispatch he was swerving, maybe on his phone.

I open with this story because I feel it is indicative of many things about me. One, I’m prepared to be that kind of a dick pretty much at all times. Two, I can confidently say I don’t drive like that, and get the fuck over or let people over. Three, I’ve both let things like that go, and elevated significantly less egregious behavior in the past.

I’ve called the police on people weaving like assholes through traffic, people clearly drunk at the gas station, and people who’ve otherwise demonstrated what I considered to be an elevated level of unsafe and ridiculous driving. Have I driven while on my phone, eating dinner, or otherwise gotten a little more swerve-y than is appropriate? Of course.

What made this make me feel justified more than hypocritical? Why did I think an intervention was required? He sat in the lane long enough for me to not just notice his truck number but memorize it. There happened to be several things the truck next to him passed, and indicated he wanted to avoid better, that he should have been able to. I was on my way to a scrap run, and the drive was feeling longer than yesterday.

This got me thinking that in general, I’m not calling people out for things like this. If anything, I lend myself to setting uncontrollable fires to your disposition independent of if it then spirals into hell or helps you. I feel this lends itself to my having “low” standards for what it takes for me to consider you or your behavior acceptable. Saying it like that makes me think things are incredibly more complicated, but maybe we’ll get there. For now, I’m merely reminded that I wore a yin yang symbol at all times for many years because I deeply vibed with the image of balance. Over time I came to understand balance as individual to each person and an inevitable fate of every particle in the universe.

I got to thinking, every puzzle is as big and small as the number of pieces it is cut into. You’re as much entire chunks of your body parts and organs as you are atoms, bacteria, or hair and dandruff. On balance, you can get many conscious beings describing their state of affairs in as many or few words as they are lent or discover. The impartial universe says you are equal enough to a thing that can reproduce for its own sake.

As a state of being, balance is by definition without judgement. All things weigh the same, until they don’t, and you either discover what brings the balance back, or you don’t. “The universe” may not care if you’re feeling anxious or depressed, but your behavior can lend itself to bringing balance back or anchoring one side.

Balance is constantly negotiated. As such, it’s easy to take it for granted as an unnecessary or thankless chore instead of a responsibility. Once you set a course of action into motion, it keeps moving unless acted upon. You need money? Get a job! Over time you find yourself hating your job, yourself, and those around you. But don’t you need money? Don’t you want to eat? How much hate is equal to new job? How much does food weigh on what you’re willing to put up with?

I think this is part of my struggle to understand the misnamed “other side” when it comes to things like Trump and fascism. I know there’s a host of underlying psychological forces. I know you can’t expect a dog to do your math homework or someone from southern Indiana to do much beyond fuck their cousin. If this is a “balance” to anything, it has to be the indifference, laziness, and hubris of people when confronted with all of the ignorant destruction that ilk represents. The universe has a dirty naked ass, wipe it, or be consumed.

I still don’t see us wiping though. We’re throwing up old mop bucket Joe next to an overflow of shit and hoping beyond hope it’ll catch just enough to keep us from drowning. We’re already drowning. We’re drowning in fear, excuses, and memes. We’re drowning in service to self-immolating capitalistic ethics. We’re drowning in ideas of our own saintliness and direction. We pretended “progress” was inevitable and not the violent ripping and defending of a standard from the abyss.

I sincerely need to get better at making escape plans. We require a revolution at a level unseen in human history. We can melt the entire planet via climate change or nuclear weapons in an instant. We will never wise up to the impossibility of negotiating with ideological and pathological terrorism, spearheaded and endorsed by fluid capital forces. What do you do besides retreat below ground until the fog clears?

I assert often that “we” don’t learn. We go to school. We pick-up various job skills and can generally meet a range of rules of survival. On the whole, I do not think the lessons earned through generations of death find their way into our being in a way that provokes constant proactive action. My immigrant grandparents birthed three out of four children willing to steal their resources and disparage their legacy after their death. Their lessons either translated to my dad and down to my brother and I, or we narrowly escaped the worse impacts and behavior related to trauma?

I return to the idea that World War II wasn’t that long ago. The idea that we would already have millions of people echoing Nazi sentiments or be ambivalent at racist flags at their rallies means an array of systems and their lesson plans failed miserably. While children are not born “blank slates,” they are malleable. If modernity has taught us anything, it’s to treat that malleability as fragile, volatile, and in need of a long-term planning and accountability.

Sometimes a small injustice is small. Sometimes larger systems subject small injustices to undue punishment. As a product of groupthink, we use conversational and psychological shortcuts to kneecap topics or people and then many years later those topics or people might embark on their comeback tour. When you’re out of balance, every injustice feels like the worst one. Every demand unmet makes you think the system can’t be persuaded. Every comparison you make involves an automatic assumption of your lack of power and constructs a narrow path to walk the story of your circumstances.

If nothing else, you can begin to bring balance back by entertaining broader and conflicting stories. You can read that as being generally “skeptical.” You can balance pessimistic sentiments with optimistic actions. You can voice your displeasure with detailed analysis and historical context while refraining from boiling everything down to how depressed or anxious you are. You can introduce oppositional voices into your safe spaces and study how they communicate or why others find them so compelling.

Out of context? My mind just said, “Relapse is part of recovery.” It’s a cliché that happens to be true. How often and severely you’re relapsing is an amplified drama when you’re accounting for the impact on children. The story of addiction is as much your personal experience and exposure as it is nefarious profit motives and crisis exploitation. For me, it’s also on the very large list of things I’ve never felt remotely compelled by. I can’t imagine my life as a methamphetamine addict or drinking myself to death. I can’t even register being a consistent smoker. Those are weights that don’t even exist on my scale. I think people get addicted to bullshit as much as anything else.

Through writing, I’ve been able to construct weights. I know how compelling my “psychopathy” feels at times verses my otherwise general indifference. I try to pay attention to when things I’m reading start to railroad thoughts of my growth or escape from a present form of consternation. I don’t “believe” I’m a good or bad person without lending snapshots of my life to scrutiny and conversation. I don’t pretend to understand myself outside of a context. Sometimes, perhaps my jaw is clenched because I’m hungry, and not because I feel the world is crumbling down around me.

I actively contend with dread. I didn’t use my time “off” between DCS and my new job to sit and spin. I got up and hunted appliances. I started forming a website. I made at least one relationship that has netted enough cash to pay the monthly bills, if nothing else, barring indulgences like room building. I seek new experiences and connections reflexively. I hauled the bricks and tore down a barn. I look for the work-around or negotiated reality.

What’s key is to remain in “reality.” You can talk yourself around reality, away from it, or never begin dealing with it. That’s what I see. That’s what I see a culture arrested by. That’s what I need to escape and feel a constant source of dread regarding. “Getting by” and “making money,” regardless of social work’s connotation is not “helping.” I’m not “growing” unless I’m refining my ability to fake enthusiasm or civility. It can all still collapse in a bigger and more dramatic way if record unemployment, 225,000 dead, the word quaking after the next thing Trump deigns to destroy, and environmental catastrophe aren’t enough for you.

You don’t want to pull together and get a little better organized? You want to scream in the street instead of takeover the castle? You want to, after about 14 years, finally be proud and share your “I voted” sticker and think that’s enough?

Wednesday, December 5, 2012

[316] Dainty Ogre Gold-Plated Pitchfork Collectors

I’d like to talk about objectification and hypocrisy, and man, is shit gonna be magic. I’m a firm believer in nailing down terms, and the ladies, to make sure we grasp just what it is we mean when we pull those little buggers from our arsenal.

Let’s start with objectifying. I was recently accused of objectifying people and merely being “kind of a doosh” when it came to interacting with people. While I would hardly deny my potential doosh tendencies, it dose sting a little when it comes from someone that you previously liked more than a little.

So I got to thinking about objectifying, what it really means. We are comprised of potentially invigorating or objectionable tendencies or attributes. To regard them, that is, to take them under consideration, can be made to be understood as “objectifying.” Are we not objects? A hand severed from a body, is a hand. Do you speak of the soul of the hand? Do you characterize its personality? I challenge a single one of you to describe the Adams’ family hand as boisterous or intractable.

I think to find someone, or something about them attractive, is not the same thing as to treat them as a train set. It’s not the same kind of enjoyment; it’s not irrespective of the being attached to those attributes. I mean, please, we live in the internet age. A body without a face or a little backstory might as well be another pilled on in a Holocaust grave. I don’t feel guilty pointing out the luck you had in not being born looking like Gollum. If I based how I treated all people or made moralistic or impractical judgments because of my innate gag reflex, then yes, that’s pretty terrible. But to pretend that’s what it’s about because I offer a compliment…like, weak.

Then I think what if I was objectified. How shitty do I feel when someone likes or doesn’t the curls in my hair? What if they don’t like a tummy verses a six pack? What if I’m too tall, too hairy, or too dead in the eyes to pop their clit right from behind their jeans? I still have to accept their judgment. I have to make myself feel icky. I have to deny my history, my proclivities, my understanding, and my current reality and validate that opinion. Who in their right mind thinks there is much utility or purpose in “objectifying” people? Make jokes and comments all day; unfortunately I’m past the point I’m going to throw it in your face like I’m on the defensive.

So I’m sure this can tie into hypocrisy somehow right? If you adopt an over-reaching conception of change, hypocrisy can’t exist. For in order to contradict yourself, you need to have a hard-lined perpetual self to stand in contrast to. You need to be saying “I am this unshakeable idea at the same time I am this unshakeable idea,” which just seems naïve and unreasonable. I think it’s too easy to be a hypocrite. It speaks to why I hate the word love. You can plaster it on anyone and anything just given your small perspective on who they are.

I think changing your mind, evolved philosophy, and personal indignation mascaraed as hypocrisy. People don’t like your reasons, they don’t understand your reasons, but very simply, you can’t stand in utter contrast to how you actually believe and are behaving. You’re no more a hypocrite than you are non-existent. For ideas and potential to be challenging or nuanced, is not the same thing as them contradicting your being. Like, every time I don’t make a fat joke within ear shot, is that hypocritical, or just smart and kinda nice?

Also, if you don’t have a grasp of the subject you’re bound to look “hypocritical” about, the judgment goes even farther out the window. You can’t even define the terms! You have a small and shifting position. Now that you’ve gained a perspective or managed to have something invested, it’s time to demonize you as a hypocrite? Maybe you’re just learning. Maybe you’ve just brushed against something that you never knew you needed to be informed about. Maybe you’re just utterly fucking terrible at arguing or laying out what it is you actually think. Then, you could even be made out as a hypocrite for getting smarter!

I think it’s important for me to suss out what I mean by these terms because I anticipate my life changing dramatically. Whether it’s getting paid massive amounts of money for making phone calls, or deciding to reorganize my social structure, to the untrained eye, it’ll be, hell, to any eye, it’ll be really easy to just judge and feel and make all sorts of blah blah blah comments about. Here’s my offer of insight. If it clicks in your head, we’re money. If not, well, fuck it I tried, guess it’s not that important anyway, right?