When it comes to communicating, seemingly, there are no rules. This is
not the same thing as saying there aren't physical limitations,
tendencies that appear across languages, or shared history and
similarities. What it means is that there are no guarantees that what
was invented in order to communicate isn’t as incidental to the time and
place as anything. The intentionality doesn't matter, and the verbs and
nouns imprecise. The fact that this is written in English is almost
perfectly for arbitrary reasons that you could list indefinitely. What I
put into it, for all of its words, will be what I get out of it
emotionally, psychologically, or what you can take away from it in your
own organization of messy and incomplete understandings of yourself.
Communication
at all is a miracle. To be understood is divine. I heard some quote
somewhere that equated “true love” to being understood. Don't we have
myriad depictions of what we consider perfect love stories and couples
who seem to “get it?” There's a world of built-in implications and
expectations that, for different people at different times in life may
or may not be reasonable or realistic. I say I often relate to the old
women who've been through a few husbands. There's a broad
attached/detachment and joy you try to bring into the moment and your
partner, and a lot of pre-sifting when it comes to things you're going
to bother worth considering a problem.
I've written nearly 850
blogs. If we averaged an hour per blog to write them, you get about 35
days worth of crawling around my head and attempting to find where I'm
at. There is no consistent theme to them. I'm just in the moment, the
words springing up as though they were there all along. Often enough I
get done writing and a headache will go away, or my heart will slow
down, or my stomach will quiet. I didn't know what I needed to say in
order for those things to happen. I don't know even that I needed to say
anything particularly specific, but I needed to talk. I needed to
anchor. Right or wrong, achievement unlocked, special badge for
“clarity” or “calm.”
I don't know that I ever expect to be
understood. I reiterate how important a single line in a movie or song
can be and how it can resonate. Stream-of-conscious doesn't mean
automatic coherence. My deepest moralizing or good-will might soak the
page until it drips helplessly at your feet while you don a befuddled
look at “what I was trying to do.” I write and analyze the ride. I
deconstruct where I think a hiccup in thought or how I'm relating to
people or the world took place. I certainly don't trust that what I'm
saying is perfectly clear or unable to be misinterpreted, and it's why I
offer the only thing that can remain constant, honesty to the moment.
I
realize now that for most of the stress in my life it came from an
inability to inhabit the present moment. Often enough, my present moment
is very frustrating. Or, I haven't taken a hold of it to decide that it
doesn't need to be that way. When you discuss past trauma and it
manifesting in a dozen ways throughout your adult life, predisposing you
to health issues, mental problems, and attachment difficulties, it's
because your current brain is still traumatized. Who wants that to be
their present moment? Or consider someone on the verge of relapsing.
Work they've done to stay sober didn't “fix” their brain. They didn't
communicate the severity of the consequences to a brain that's in
disrepair. It needs tools and an environment to distract and build upon.
My
community dwindled, my prospects zeroed into a work life I'm not crazy
about, a remote living environment, and a habit of semi-compulsively
watching, reading, or dreading the moment the awareness of how good it
might be feeling is going to go away. So I anchor and continue to
explore. So I talk to myself, because I don't think your brain needs the
entirety of mine to cope with as well.
I don't consider it a
bad thing to be misunderstood, but an opportunity to find shared
language. It can also be the line you come up to and realize you don't
want to cross. I know what my boundaries for acceptable communication
are. I know the difference between processing and flailing, and even if
they might both need to be engaged in sometimes, I'm not going to
contribute unless we're going somewhere. My experience “debating”
religious ideologues prepared me for the futility of honest exchange
arrested by ideology. We don't assume we're under our own spell of
assumptions though. It's easy to point at religion or fascism and see
the deadly consequences, smug looks, and broad scary cringe. You,
though? No no, you're reasonable. You're being as clear and specific as
possible. You can be held harmless. You don't even raise your voice.
I
know that I have my own superimposed mythology to cope with life and my
place in it along with everyone else. I try to formulate that mythology
one line at a time. I try to recognize when I think I'm getting
something right, count the times I'm getting it wrong, and weigh actual
values of engagement and achievement. I try to read old blogs to see if
I'm keeping a common thread of progress towards stated goals. I try to
remember the frustrations of my present moment that existed back then
and that I might still be carrying. It's an incredible amount of work
that you can start to take for granted if you forget where you've been
or built better habits over time. I still suspect somewhere in my life
I'll rock a solid body that starts to feel “normal” too, and forget I
didn't “just go to the gym” or “just eat better.”
One of the
biggest disappointments I have with regard to my old friend group was
the inability or unwillingness to relay the actual problem at the time.
This building resentment grew until everyone felt the time to air
grievances and disassociate could be relegated to facebook chats and
comments. This prompted people to pile on after a rape allegation. So
far, one person has apologized for “how that all played out” and
recognized the unfair and impossible circumstances that were created.
Does it take away my responsibility to try and understand where people
were coming from or how I contributed to how they felt? Absolutely not.
Is it fair to expect me to change for the better, acknowledge and
respect where they're coming from, or feel particularly responsible when
I'm not given the same chance to be understood or respected? Absolutely
not.
As such, I can understand about myself that I'm willing to
be continually misunderstood. I'm willing to maintain an open
disposition and discuss anything, but it's going to come with conditions
of specificity and measurable metrics for success. I write until I'm
done, therefore successful. If you need to talk just so someone will
listen, I'm down. If we need to talk to come to an agreement on chores
or expenses or whether a party can be held without things getting out of
hand, I'm there. If we need to closely examine physical boundaries and
how we speak to each other or hit on each other, sign me up. Never will
it be acceptable though to attempt any or all of those with your mind
already made up about who I am, who you are, and the congeniality of
your position over mine. We're probably both wrong and should figure out
how.
And I suspect, once we get over the major hurdle of our
assumptions and held-harmless positions, it'll be the littlest of things
that need adjusted, and the work of doing so will contribute to
built-in better habits. They have to be built, because again, there are
no rules. They have to be reinforced and reintroduced. If you can find a
better thing to apply an anxious or compulsive mind to, let me know.
No comments:
Post a Comment