Saturday, July 18, 2026

[1262] Too Bright

It’s not your fault.

Is there a more compelling idea? As an animal seemingly most suited in any environment to blame something reflexively, if not instinctively. We’re terrified of getting blamed and ostracized. We can’t be held responsible for the things we say, do, or believe. Literally anything else was and is always the reason.

I think this habit is a sickness of consciousness. We didn’t ask to be born. Existence itself is the victimizer, therefore, anything that exists genuinely feels like “the reason” or an ongoing perfect excuse ready to be deployed into any unwelcome moment.

The more abstract and loose your language, the easier to iterate. “People,” “life,” “things,” “they,” “it is what it is.” The more familiar or culturally accepted your cliche, the easier it goes down in your audience. The easier you convince yourself of the wisdom, purpose, and factuality of your own pseudo-position.

For some reason, we can blame infinitely, and feel blamed infinitely, but redemption only needs to happen once. You’re the evil character in the movie or across the entire franchise? Just throw the emperor over the ledge once and we’ll get right to shedding a tear for you. Heaven is infinite, no? We, conveniently, outsource the obligation to forgive or be redeemed.

In sports, there’s always the next game or the next season, if you get fired, a lower stakes team or less popular region. The stakes are artificially high, but unless you’re an acutely unlucky player, almost never is it life or death. The ball bouncing wrong might result in an own goal. Millions of fans will be happy to blame you. Your intentions, training, perspective, or any millions of details about the physics and weather that speak to why a ball might go one place over another are summarily ignored. Why?

Your feelings aren’t your fault.

That’s what the fans say, just not out loud. How they feel about your place is their right! How dare you question or contradict or protest in this moment of your colossal failure that you, too, have feelings, and aren’t at fault. Just because it happened to be your foot doesn’t mean you weren’t trying to kick it elsewhere!

And no one is prepared to hear you. If you’re from Columbia back in 1994, when you returned home, they killed you.

You catch it? “They” didn’t kill you. A single person did. A single person with a grievance about money they didn’t even need. A single person involved with drug trafficking. That single person was never brought to justice, only experiencing a relatively mild headache of brief incarceration.

What do “we” learn from this? Nothing. I, at least, already know people die for nothing and no reason and are perfectly content excusing away their actions indefinitely. What does that do for how and whether I engage the world?

I’m big on trying to not be like “everyone” else. I spend a lot of time clocking patterns of thought, speech, and behavior, and consciously try to do “things” or “it” differently. Writing is part of it. You, probably, don’t write, let alone consistently. You don’t spend the time trying to sort your thoughts and look for pitfalls or patterns that could help you stay oriented. If you do write, you might not do it with the intention of trying to orient.

I write so I can distribute blame appropriately and locate the point at which it enters the chat. Once you know better, you’re to blame. Every explicit fascist and “ho-hum” fascist is to blame for Trump, death squads and concentration camps, and the precarity with which we have rested the system altogether. They, in literal violent protest, knew better. They know you’re not supposed to lie and be racist. They know there’s math and experts that do hard work to keep us safe and coherent. They know, even if they have broken stupid brains that can’t critically think, they know. And the last decade has been a campaign of trying to pretend otherwise.

You know you’re dumb, or lazy, or dishonest. You do know. I do not trust you when you tell me you don’t know, or when it takes the shape of asserting what you claim to know or want, but your actions don’t match. You make a lot of wishes, and don’t do the kind of work that renders them into what they involve in reality.

These feel like big swing statements, right? Except, it’s not that complicated. You want more time, but you don’t make time for anyone but work or things that feel like obligations, but in fact are choices. You say you’re lonely and want friends or a partner, but spend no time acting friendly or developing what you’d bring to the partnership. You want your feeling appeased. You don’t want to do the work.

My clients “want to stay sober,” but they don't want to keep a daily journal about how they’re feeling. They don’t want to speak up in group. They don’t want to put the order of operations together that builds a coherent budget, hours they need to work, timeline for getting their kids back, or opens a discussion with a boyfriend that is significantly more boy than friend. You don’t want to stay sober, you want to have it your chaotic, incoherent, entitled own way. You want your insecurities or sense of being overwhelmed painted over by a story of your effort instead of the consequences of a lack of it.

Post modern internet, we’ve never had the “lack of information” excuse. We don’t just know, we have a dozen deep dive evidence-flowing documentaries about every angle of any given issue. We know all the things inflicted upon us by our corrupted officials and acutely small-minded thinking. We know the bad guys. We know the dumb guys. We know the lazy guys. We know what we’d have to do to make it right. We’d rather do nothing, complain, and criticize those who continue inviting us to the real work.

Thursday, July 2, 2026

[1261] Imagine Me And You

One day, I'm going to take every seemingly vague concept we have and build a measurable scaffolding. If it's measurable, we'll call it "real." If it's real, we'll decide on thresholds for calling it "fixed."

Racism
Sexism
Patriarchy
Trans-phobia
Christo-fascism
Islamophobia
Violence

I think, most days, across most issues, most people have a "null" or "non" opinion unless provoked into citing a lazy cliche or repeating whatever they last heard.

This results in an endless nonsense loop of "talking past," "interpretation," and "post-modern obfuscation."

Words are loose. Perception is loose. These are unavoidable. The closest thing we get to "objective" is the collective convergence and ongoing scrutiny. All of our observations added up gives us a moving target, but a target nonetheless.

This means if you're unwilling or unable to add them up, you're functionally not and never talking about "anything." You're not sharing anything. You're not able to situate some goal or claim you have about "the thing" you never reasonably established or made available to anyone else in the first place.

This is the self-justification and ideological possession of what will eventually get us all killed if we don't grasp the nature of it.

Religiosity
Anger/Hatred
Genocide
Values
Morality
Justice

Everyone has a plan until they are punched in the face.

You have extremely vague approximations of how to conduct yourself and what you're made of. You get sick, things snap into focus. Someone presents a problem or obligation they say is yours, you often dutifully fall into a worker mode that tries to solve it.

You're not allowed to "just exist." you need to work for a living. You need to find a spouse. You need to be into the artists or news channels everyone is talking about. "You" need to be "Us." And "We" are an amorphous ever-justifying narrative exercise. We are what "everyone does" or "anyone would."

The linguistic traps are the air we breathe. The circular side-step of accountable logic is baked into trivially necessary survival. "Have a nice day!" You just checked out of a grocery store with inflated prices owned by a family that refuses to pay its workers more than the "market values."

Is that "nice" for either of you because the job isn't hard, you didn't have to hunt for food, and "all things considered," no one wants the nihilistic take when they are "just trying" to eat or pay the bills?

How often we get away with invoking "the world" or "people" to make a point about either. It's incoherent, but the point was never about coherence. We get high on self-justification narrative exercises. "People are...!" whatever you need them to be in the moment. "The world is just....!" Whatever antagonizes the feeling in the moment.

I think I understand why monks are silent, and when they speak it's something of a seeming contradiction or parable. There's a process by which you can snap things into focus. A king who says we'll cut the baby in half and give both of you claiming mothers a piece. The one who "really cares" says "Fuck that! she can keep him!" And is thus rewarded with the baby.

Anyone can make a claim. The truth of it is an ongoing story pocked with extremely telling reflexive utterances. Maybe both women genuinely care about that baby. One was willing to sacrifice her relationship to it for the baby's sake. A wise king engineered a scenario to illicit impossible-to-discern otherwise information to help him decide.

What about you? You're not a master manipulator of your scene or deciding life and death, right? Or, you're hyper-aware of how that's exactly what you are and it induces all sorts of denial, paralysis, fear, and a doubling down of the self-justification narrative exercise. How do you know?

Catch yourself when you're using cliches.

That's it. That's as robust a first step as you need. Catch when you start a sentence with "people" or "the world." Notice when you invoke "they." Count up the amount of "I can't just..." You'll start to see how often you let "we" and "us" dictate your worth, capacity, potential, or agency altogether. You'll start to feel, viscerally, how often "no one" is talking about "anything." The secret behind why we struggle so hard to cohere as a human race or vestige of an American culture won't be a mystery.

Our technology, or lack thereof, used to compel more of a mono-culture. Our baseline self-justification mechanism could only go as far as our local tribe. The punch in the face of letting it get radicalized could happen much sooner and was materially felt immediately.

We've stretched out the feedback mechanism. The most horrible thing you've ever heard or seen is on a loop to seemingly no consequence. It's tailored to your "interests." Its back is marketed from for more attention and more clicks and more shares. The less anything means something, the more it can manifest in its infinite capacity to distract, incite, or become monetized through your attention.

"We" can never fix what you as an individual can't notice, correct, take ownership and responsibility for, and demonstrate for those in your local, and thus global, tribe.

You have to speak deliberately, for yourself as much as for anyone listening.

You have to stop giving your time to things that do not serve you like a mother willing to let you go.

You have to make demands from and pull power away from those incentivized to make the problems worse.

"Nothing" gets "better" if you can't understand or be bothered to accept how you're contributing to making "things" worse. You don't have to spend money. You don't have to click. You don't have to do anything but catch yourself in the act.

If enough of "us" do that, and count those instances, and dial up or down our behavior in service to "fixing" or "changing" something, like magic, we'll get the world we practice.

It's not hard. It's not complicated. It's not moralizing, theorizing, or experimenting. It's accounting. It's noticing. It's doing, or not doing, and refusing to pretend we're "trying" if we aren't.