It’s 3 AM and I’m home from day 2 of the Limestone Comedy Festival in Bloomington, Indiana. Earlier today, I was at St. George Serbian Orthodox Church in Schererville where I was a pallbearer for my 45 year old cousin’s funeral. It was close to 3 AM that I arrived to the area driving up the night before, and after a viewing, church service, burial, and lunch, I made the drive back, finding myself exhausted and briefly/uncontrollably drifting lanes just before the Lafayette exit I was looking to pull over on to take a nap.
Saturday, May 31, 2025
[1203] Same Page
Thursday, May 22, 2025
[1202] Ring My Bell
I’m dancing around writing because I’ve gotten home particularly late and wish to be done with the day. No less, my brain is buzzing, and pretending I’m focusing on TV and my delicious New Belgium Trippel isn’t going to serve me as well as just getting in the weeds.
I’ve gone full steam ahead with my new job after functionally begging The Y to fire me. I’m now back to my regular casework and IOP counseling space. There’s approximately 70 people living in 8 or 9 houses owned by the company I work for. I do 4 groups a week, and have made it my mission to assess the needs of all 70 over the last few weeks in an effort to standardize how we carry out casework or “life skills.”
This program is only 4 months. What I noticed immediately is how many people were discharging without any idea where they were going next. This is IOP. Some have transferred from other similar programs, some straight out of prison, some from homelessness, or inpatient detox. All very early recovery circumstances. It appeared like the owners had a blind spot in the expectations they had of the people in their care, and it was leading to this being a messy pass-through spot more than a place to really practice the necessary skills.
As I’m inclined to do, I started asking about what the whole picture/process was, and started brainstorming how to do it better. People don’t know where they’re going? Do we have any information we provide them to get a place lined up? No? Okay, let me do that. I spent 10 hours building a resource packet so, day 1, if you’re so inclined, you can call about what the availability might be at 6 different locations. I’m going to presume innocent enough oversight as to why this wasn’t standard issue already, but in modeling what I’m counseling, I asked what I could contribute more than bitch about, and then did the thing.
This gets into what get so exhausting about these environments. You can be the living active embodiment of the values you’re talking about, how you arrived at those values, and have a direct causal impact on the people you need to affect, and the overwhelming majority will still look at you like you’re high and full of shit. They’ll cling that much harder to what they know* and if you don’t relay “your” message in a way they care to hear it, be prepared for their emotional fallout.
I’m experienced and distanced enough to not take things personally. I don’t let verbal disagreements or awkward moments linger for some prolonged period of time. But when they happen, like they did today, it highlights the frustrating parts of work like this. I need to meet with 70 people a week, at least once, so I can get us all on the same page and hopefully empower some practical direct next steps. You’d think the relatively captive audience who are lucky enough to be in this program would be mostly receptive to what I have to give. Or, you’d be wiser to what it means to be an animal who is exhausted and learned to cope with addictive substances.
At least half of any house I visited is often asleep. Doesn’t matter if I’m there at 1, 3, or 6, or if I saw them awake earlier in the day for IOP. Almost none have a job, but say they want/need one. Almost none have resumes, but claim they can create one. Almost none know where they’re going to go, how to get their personal documentation, or find the nearest open food pantry. But, they’re asleep! Like there’s nothing to do, learn, or figure out. And to be sure, I’m not begrudging anyone their developmental capacity or if they struggle to read or write. I’m talking people who are perfectly capable who, somehow, find so much time to sleep, and fill their waking hours with criticisms about how the program isn’t working for them.
When I show up with a resource packet, I have people waking up just long enough to say “Okay, I’ll come in the kitchen” and go back to sleep. I have people taking “important phone calls” and “gonna smoke real quick” ducking sitting down for even 10 minutes. I have people who manifest migrains so they don’t have to leave their room, but they were healthy enough to engage in trafficking teenagers the night before. Or, you get people who, it’s as if they can’t really listen, so if you deliberately and explicitly say you’re in a rush, they’ll turn yes or no questions into 5-minute meanders. And, dare you choose to assert your boundary and respect for time and blow up your rapport, you can redirect them back to the task with a now checked-out child whose feelings you hurt.
In an environment where you’d think you’d want every possible means of not staying stuck in self-destructive cycles, you will get the most unironically judgmental attitudes you have to dodge instinctively or they’ll wear you down. In a place where people will loudly proclaim their goals and values and you’ll spend hours breaking down how to demonstrate and celebrate them step by step, literally in the next breath you’ll think you’ve entered a parallel universe because the automatic and familiar reaction dictates the scene. You don’t talk yourself into new behaviors. You literally have to practice the new thing you want, or you’ll only get what you’ve always done. This is one more time that I practiced patience, self-forgiveness (for hurting that client’s feelings), redirecting the anger/exhaustion of my perception of the entitlement and laziness.
I don’t judge people as some kind of specific good or bad thing. I’m not even feeling anything in particular about “them” as “individuals.” I’m exhausted by the human animal and it’s typical, predictable, boring as fuck cliche nature. I first reached that place with regard to myself and my own behavior, and now it allows me the distance and license to recognize and diagnose yours. It’s taken my 21 years and 1,2001 blogs and counting to just barely pull my own head out of my ass. I don’t take you seriously when you defy the idea that you should fill out a worksheet or make a phone call. I don’t respect you as a serious and moral thinker when you tell me “I’m good at pretty much everything I do” and “I don’t have triggers” when we’re having this conversation in your structured rule-bound grant-funded sober-living environment.
You’re lying. I know it’s coming from feeling vulnerable. But what makes it worse is where I locate the truest and deepest lie. You think you’re more vulnerable than anyone else. You think your pain is unique. You think your anger, dread, fear, and sense of hopelessness is special. That feels downright insulting. That feels like a dare. This, of course, my personal silliness that needs to be accounted for and dealt with directly. Eventually, though, when you’re just lied to so profoundly and with such conviction thousands and thousands of times, it changes you. And it’s not always clear if that change is a certain kind of wisdom, or deadening.
Some people do get it. They contribute, and work, and write a ton down, and ask questions, and share what they’ve been reading about or watching. They help each other. They thank you for investing in them and taking the time and creating things like a resource packet that anticipated some of their worst fears. Each person is a universe unto themselves, and with that in mind, the adage I used to ridicule about “If I can only help one person, then it’ll be worth it!” rings differently. Those handful can often account for the worst behaving actors that day. They help me bother to keep playing this kind of game and maintain my perspective about the nature of “help.” I show up for singular people in my life all the time.
I do genuinely believe that the more of us who find the same kind of exhaustion and perspective about tired and cliche human shit, “things” get “better.” I don’t think it’s a “belief” that we’re all connected, and the less poisonous any given node is in that network, the better. I will almost certainly never know the extent to which it’s better, but it certainly isn’t worse, which is the second best way to confirm why you should bother with a course of action. (If I’m barely understanding a Mindscape podcast episode that was way over my head.)
Tomorrow I need to input some 40 notes and chase down 10-15 people. Over the weekend I need to create several weeks worth of curriculum packets. I’m still trying to nail down how my effort will land me somewhere close to the 100K/year mark. In context, I can deal with as many sleepy, defiant, and defensive clients as I must if the money’s right.
Wednesday, May 21, 2025
[xx-28] An Email Exchange That Will Get You Fired From The YMCA
Mom:
I am reaching out to follow up on the recent behavior incident and write up that occurred yesterday, 5/13/25. I understand that T inappropriately physically engaged with a staff member, Mrs Anna, and was unable to be redirected. I do believe that a write up is an appropriate response to this behavior.
My concern that I would like to address is that when I picked T up I was told, "I can't find the other write up but I know there is a fourth one" so T will be suspended. This feels unprofessional and biased. In fact, the last time that T was written up, the third offense, Mr Nick ripped up the document and did not submit it. That is why it is not in the notebook. Because it was thrown away. Yesterday's write up was the third time I have signed documentation of inappropriate behavior, not the fourth. Additionally, there was a threat of expulsion for the rest of the year should T have a behavioral issue again. Being T's mom, and not new to this process, I know that there is, in fact a process, and that it is not one suspension - expulsion.
I feel that Nick is annoyed with T on most days and would prefer to have a before and after school program free of any children with exceptional needs, creating a bias, either blatant or implicit, that has sought to remove all children from the program that have exceptional needs and problematic behaviors.
When I have asked about the behavior plan that was created specifically for the YMCA I am met with perceived annoyance, and an attitude that communicates that it's too much to have to provide extra care. This leads me to believe that it is not being followed or enforced by Nick. I am curious to know how it was followed in response to the incident that happened yesterday? What specific tenets of the behavior plan were implemented prior to contacting classroom teachers as an intervention?
Please communicate, in writing, how to move forward for the remainder of the school year in an equitable manner that provides T with what he needs to be successful at the YMCA Before and After Care at MC and how his behavior plan will be followed with fidelity. It is my intention that T will return on Monday and will complete the school year in your program.
On my end, T has received an appropriate consequence at home and I have contacted his medical staff to try another medication adjustment -- he was allergic to the last medicine and we've been recovering from that waiting to try something new to assist in managing behavior.
----------------
Me:
Thank you for your email. I appreciate detailed explanations of perspectives, and am happy to share mine as well.
I certainly forgot about ripping up the 4th (3rd) write-up. The suspensions happen after the 3rd one, so I apologize for any clunky phrasing there or confusion. It's not meant to be a "threat" by informing of the 4th write-up consequences, and certainly apologize if it was perceived that way. That's Y rules, and Katie asked me to relay that in event of physical inappropriateness.
When it comes to addressing the needs of children with elevated needs, I can only speak from my experience in the room, after taking feedback from staff, and the conversations over months I've had with colleagues and leadership. I know the Y, myself included, strives to be an inclusive environment. To the extent we have the staff, training, and capacity to accommodate, we certainly do, often even in direct threat to the other children in the room. Recall, T wasn't just pulling on Anna's shoulders, but pulled another participant's hair.
My concern is for the safety and stability of every single child in the room. When staff are in fear, monopolized, or expressing exhaustion and frustration that they aren't doing enough in spite of the above-and-beyond efforts they engage in, we come up hard against our limits and difficult conversations need to occur. Any perception of my being "annoyed" is often with the inability to discuss honestly the consequences of being unable to meaningfully engage the children or find an effective persistent resolution when the behaviors become acute.
Anna attempted to redirect T and clearly communicate at what point we were in the day. There's a point in an exchange with any child who is acting out where, plan or not, it's not working, so I think it wise to seek out the professionals who often have some intervention throughout the day that worked in a way the plan might not. None of the Y staff are trained to do anything beyond basic levels of intervention and accommodation. When those fail, what more would you ask than deferring to those who can do better?
As you've clearly communicated to us several times during medication shifts or tests for new things, there are days where it's not a Y staff member's failing patience or competence that's going to meaningfully inform the effectiveness of any intervention. If this was again one of those times, usually we are given a head's up and attempt to plan accordingly.
I gathered that the staff I reached out to were particularly annoyed in this instance, and I've forwarded my concerns and asks for how/whether we're actually going to be partners in meaningfully accounting for needs or how/when we should relay concerns to Ms. Nichols. The last few days, every single day, one of his teachers has asked me how T is doing in the program. I took that to mean they would be appreciative that I was timely in roping them in when the story was less than ideal.
One last note on my personal experience of bias or annoyance. There are a great many things related to the Y that I could explicate my feelings about, but doing something actionable and reasonable to ensure the children can enjoy the program are not it. Every child that has been expelled or suspended from the program has been physically aggressive or hurt other children, with enough regularity that even in grading on extreme curves and doing things like ripping up write-ups, they still manage to remain unresolvable. I don't have a good answer as to why it's The Y's, any individual staff member's, or any given child's responsibility to navigate physical aggression from another participant. My answer is, they shouldn't have to.
-------------
Mom:
Additionally. I do not have the expectation that anyone should tolerate T being physically aggressive. I am not upset about him having a consequence for this, being written up, or even being suspended.
My concern is the perception that Nick lacks the patience, empathy, and wherewithal to manage multiple levels of needs and is being intentional to remove all problems to have the program that he "wants".
Several times I have observed facial expressions of annoyance, irritation, and displeasure towards T. T in turn picks up on this energy and it further complicates an already complicated situation.
His teachers are asking how he's doing because they are also under the impression that T is not wanted in this program and there is a target to run him out. His behavior therapist who is there Wednesday and Friday has also picked up on this and commented to me about this. It is just not my perception.
This is why I'm bringing these concerns. Honestly, I feel like Nick has just been waiting for this to happen and is eagerly anticipating being able to expel him.
That feels unfair, unprofessional, and inappropriate.
-----------
Me:
What I cannot do is argue/debate perception. I have no control over how I'm perceived, but have lived long enough to know people are often very comfortable speaking about me more than to me, and diagnosing my thoughts or feelings. I don't take it personally, but I also don't think it lends itself to constructive means for navigating scenarios like this.
If you truly do not think anyone should tolerate T being physical with people, how do you account for him not being expelled months ago? He's been physical at least a dozen times to varying degrees. The not-quite-implied response I often got from Y leadership was lines about inclusivity and accommodation. I've literally ripped up a write-up. I don't know how that reality squares with the idea that I have a particular agenda against T or have some nefarious plot to exclude him. In fact, I've deliberately stayed out of his altercations until, inevitably, one of the women on my staff have called me over because their redirect attempts and plan-indicated steps weren't working. I've said since day 1 that it's absurd that I should ever have to occupy the space of implied power (as in strength) to trigger something in him to stop what he's doing. I have zero inclination or desire to physically intimidate children, and yet I've been invited to, too often, from women looking to be "saved."
I "want" the kind of program that at least operates at a basic level of common sense and decency. I've written maybe 20 write-ups for kids who've acted out aggressively. Not a single one has come back with notes about how I should work overtime to justify their behavior and let it go. I also don't make decisions in a vacuum, hence my regular discussions with school staff, my supervisor, colleagues, and you to try and come up with a means of not having my staff feel under threat. It's a Kafka trap. I either have to be the "bad guy" holding people accountable and then painted as targeting, or I let it all go crazy, and sheepishly explain to my staff and parents how safe and coherent we are as some magnificent gaslighting effort.
It's not about being "not wanted." I don't have feelings about any child one way or another. I'm not wired that way. I want a safe space where we can conduct activities and teach skills in a consistent and accountable way. By definition, through no fault of his own, if T has a level of need that high-school students, para-professionals, and otherwise regular explicitly not trained but merely encouraged staff cannot meet, the program might not be a good fit. If The Y was willing to hire someone certified to occupy him and allow the rest of staff to stay in ratio and attend to the other obligations of the space, there wouldn't be an issue. The Y seems unwilling to do that. I don't know why, I suspect they have money.
I've got a thousand deeper concerns in my life before I conjure some soured spirit to wish ill and expulsion of a child. Like, points for being that dark and cold before ever finding the curiosity behind my thought processes or experience in navigating Y policy, plans, and directives. Even entertaining this lurid desire I could have, why did I wait until the end of the year to carry out the plan? Why didn't I push every incident just as obviously unacceptable as the latest from the past? I consider myself decently intelligent. Surely, I could have orchestrated something without routinely asking for help and leaving email paper trails with every other adult in his life.
It's my understanding that Sanders made a point of targeting T. I'm not Sanders. Your son has physically intimidated and scared staff. He's pushed, pulled, and grabbed at them, as well as other children. He's done it A LOT. He's done it for reasons I don't blame him for, but need to be real about the effect they've had. You've stated explicitly he has the kind of condition that makes it a struggle to control impulses. You've explained the regular complications that affect his mood when there are medication shifts or a lack of sleep. I've watched school staff get this hardened pride and face about how "we don't' put up with that" as they lament what I assume is their increasingly frustrated perception of our leniency when I asked them for help.
If you're concerned about T picking up on my "energy," I've deliberately kept out of being the one to intervene with any/all of the children that have required plans to be followed or special attention paid. I'm aware of my competencies and weaknesses. I have zero desire to make something worse. If you're upset, it's because the people like Anna who are the most forgiving, most patient, and who, almost every day, ritually whip themselves asking "What more could I have done?!" while I have to reassure them that they followed the plan and sometimes things don't work. It's not me barreling into his life picking a fight or losing my patience.
It felt unfair, unprofessional, and inappropriate to have to downplay how the program operated before I got there. I'm the 4th or 5th person to take the roll in the last year or two? Because accommodation graduated to negligence. I'm literally formerly DCS. I have a thing about what constitutes safety and security. I'm comfortable saying the quiet parts out loud.
Sunday, May 18, 2025
[1201] Between You And Me
Wednesday, May 14, 2025
[1200] Quite The Day
Today has all the makings of “a day.”
Wednesday, May 7, 2025
[1199] Pending
I’m thankful that time appears to have returned to it’s “normal” pace for me this week. That said, I’ve still yet to find a new flow. I’ve been the kind of tired I hear people my age and older routinely complain about, so yesterday I went straight to bed after getting home around 7:30. I woke up a few hours later and went straight back to sleep. I’ve still been yawning all day and staving off a headache.