I have about a dozen disparate sources of thought I'm trying to synthesize, so don't think too hard and come along for the ride.
Some of the criticisms I've received from
writing, if you can consider them as much beyond a personal attack,
is that I maintain this posture as offering the capital T Truth of a
situation, and that I'm something of a two-bit or wanna-be
philosopher. I bring these up not because I find them compelling, but
because they are persistent. I certainly don't believe the people
keen and quick in offering these sentiments are concerned about the
reasons I'd started writing or when I think it necessary to continue.
I don't claim to be a “philosopher”
in some kind of formal way. Pythagoras came up with the word to mean
a “lover of wisdom.” Anyone can be that, and my demonstration of
that love is to search for and attempt to embody the wisdom in the
many areas that keep me thinking. The charge about offering the Truth
of any or all situations I find exceptionally pernicious and
disingenuous. Informally, I've referred to it as “I know you are,
but what am I” syndrome. I can say it every day, bookend it on
every blog, I don't claim to have the Truth. I have my experience to
the best of my ability to articulate and remember it. I'm engaging a
process, not dictating a mythological ethos.
I'm watching
Awakening from the Meaning Crisis with John Vervaeke. I'm about
halfway through the 52 hour course. He provides a broad overview of
many different philosophical ideas and religious traditions. He puts
titanic figures in context and shows how their ideas responded or
incorporated who came before. I've read a number of philosophical
works, taken classes in college, and written papers or blogs in
service to what I've read. You know what never stops? Your need and
desire to think about and practice what other thoughtful people have
brought to the conversation.
Whether or not you read a book
or an argument doesn't mean you understand them, and certainly
doesn't mean you've experienced anything like what they're getting
at. I recall getting an A on a philosophy paper where I deliberately
felt I'd “fuck around” with some modern philosopher's position. I
was praised for not merely regurgitating what he was saying, which
also would have gotten me an A in a “safe” way, and which the
grad student grading the papers was sick of reading. I don't remember
the philosopher, or the argument, or how I fucked with it. I just got
a deep sense that so much of these “thought experiments” and
“professionals” was considerably more loose or playful than you'd
suspect at first pass.
Most often, as I'm in the middle of
some lecture or hear some salient point made by some nerd on a
podcast about climate change or the supreme court, I'm met with how
dissatisfied I am with people broadly. I'm struck by how little they
think. It's like the whole world opens up as this plaything because I
can influence or direct my understanding of what's driving or sucking
people up. Are they draped in the nihilism of endless consumption?
Probably. Are they exhausted, angst-ridden, anxious, or otherwise
adrift looking for a new religion or meaningful supplemental
occupation? You tell me, how many people refer to or treat their pets
like children? I don't just “dislike” things like Tik Tok or
memes, I worry for our collective “soul” that so much has been
articulated, but can't find its way into our practice or language.
We're addicted to the shortcuts and dopamine flashes.
I've
tried to make the deliberate and ongoing point that this process,
this writing, whatever it amounts to, is necessary. It's useful. It's
how I work to “embody” the things I say and empower the things I
do in the world. I can look back through blogs and see what has
stayed the same while I've been under constant bombardment from
errant criticism, endless distractions, or misguided notions of who I
am to people or what they are to me. There's no Dewey decimal system
in my head where I can just bring up where and when my ideas of
“love” have gone wrong or right. I can't begin to explain what
“friendship” has meant or evolved into over time like turning to
an illuminating chapter of your favorite book without it being
written down.
You may be thinking I'm making some kind of
pretentious and overstated claim about how little people are
thinking. You, in fact, are very thoughtful,
and you have a lot of strong opinions about not just the state of the
world, but how I talk about it. For the longest time, I wanted to
grant this special privilege to the people able or willing to read
what I might discern from the cultural ether. I dropped that. It's
not that I haven't experienced you as such or on an appreciable level
of awareness or enlightenment, it's that I've watched it fall prey to
things I can't reconcile with maintaining respect.
I
don't respect silence, for example. I don't respect meme-speak. It's
not to say I'm not silent on a great many things or have never shared
a meme, but the days where my feed is ten pictures you found mildly
amusing, maybe, I don't know where you exist. I feel like I bring
this up a lot because it bugs me a lot and I think it's a massive
cultural psychosis we've worked ourselves into in normalizing
not-think. I want you to hesitate before sharing the picture, then I
want you to turn a series of hesitations into a long enough pause to
explore what's really going on with you in sharing.
I think
about this with regard to my last relationship. In a real sense, this
is one of the cleanest, at least emotionally, breaks I've ever had. I
had expectations for our interactions that had absolutely nothing to
do with some elevated level of “love” or historically romantic
notions of our time together. I don't care who you are, if we're
going to be “close” or “intimate” or “trust” each other,
that's not going to happen if you can't be a friend. My friends
aren't routinely yelling at me, giving me the silent treatment, or
conjuring memories of growing up where I was hyper tense and aware of
the mood-shift so as to avoid getting knocked around by my mother. My
friends let me speak without interruption, and I grant them the same
courtesy. My friends tell me they're going to do something, and then
do it, and if they're going to use me or my things, they express
appreciation or know they're on the hook for fucking something up.
I
took my time getting into the relationship, and I suffered the things
wrong with it until I broke. It's a break that I will learn from and
do better next time by not allowing myself to ignore the escalation
or mask it under the guise of “accepting someone where they are.”
I understand people as having no clue where they are, and it's
something I downplay or express some faux humility about at my peril.
I understand people as having the kind of mindless irony of an
arrested teenager struggling to cope with their incomplete brain and
personal trauma. It's not a gratifying point that my home has
returned to a place of peace and comfort after removing someone I
care about. It's an existentially critical point about how we quell
our sense of loneliness or emptiness despite superficially having
everything we could ever want.
I'm extremely impressed with
many of the book passages and sentiments from Daniel Sherrell who was
featured on the Know Your Enemy podcast. He discussed the conditions
under which you embody something verses just knowing intellectually.
You have to let in the depths of the dread and despair and marry it
to the action you take in your day-to-day or long-term, if not
infinite, project. Dorothy Fortenberry, also featured in the episode,
discussed having kids with no expectations of them ever thanking you
or even smiling with regard to your efforts in service to them, and
yet knowing you had them for reasons not to do with your own
gratification.
What resonated so deeply was a sensibility that
I've had to cultivate over time. It's a form of acceptance, not of
fate, but of known and unknown conditions. Whatever hell you may be
suffering, I can only choose to roll the dice with engaging or not. I
can only open myself up, tolerate the vulnerability, and live the
consequences of sharing my honest experience. I can't make you accept
me, be patient, swallow any of my “reasons” you may regard as
“excuses.” My harshest judgments of you either lend themselves to
changes in my behavior or mood, or they get used to beat you to
death. I can claim a certain awareness of when I'm choosing to beat
you to death, like in blowing up at my ex, but it's a wasted
awareness if I didn't want to do that and chose to anyway. There's
areas in which I'm bound to the notion of getting “license” or
“permission” to access parts of me predicated on granting you the
agency and responsibility of inviting me in. If I'm bound to a
blood-lust like a vampire, I'm forgoing my agency, and thus cannot
grant you my honest impression of your agency. I'm then eschewing the
responsibility for my actions.
I want responsibility, and
begrudging the conditions under which I might yield it doesn't serve
me. So that means I don't get “normal” relationships. That means
I get to feel “alone,” and any orientation I maintain that baits
people or tests people is about me, not them. I don't really know how
to reconcile this with what it would take to create or empower a new
culture or zeitgeist. I'm not actually a god nor claim some special
enlightenment. At some level, it feels like I either maintain
expectations I regard as self-preserving, reasonable, and practical,
or I drop all expectations and just work people like I know how to
work them. Think about it, how many people have you had thank you or
shake your hand after you explained you took their children? How many
strangers' homes have you been invited into? How many children have
you been trusted to drive all over the state with? How many hundreds
of people have you invited into your home? How many codes have you
had to switch or topics have you had to incorporate to create things
that represent your highest ideals?
If you believe, and I use
that word liberally, anything less than me about yourself or what
you're capable of, by my understanding and definition, you're at my
mercy. I can provoke you. I can work you. I can convince you. If you
don't know what you're capable of, whether or not you're doing
anything for good or bad reasons, I do. I'm not under the illusion
that everything I do is for a good or coherent reason. I couldn't
take myself seriously if I regarded what you told me as some
threatening Truth claim or if I reflexively felt ick
and sought to write you off as some lazy airhead. All I can do is
make peace with using you until you “wake up” and buy in.
That
sounds so crass and cold and feels like the heart of a many years
long project I've been trying to avoid. I dance around what I'm
capable of precisely because I know what I'm capable of.
A cultural project needs the people who are going to be a part of
that culture. I didn't party alone, but I garnered all the resentment
for the consequences of the party environment, earned and unearned. I
can invite you to my land, but you can be stuck linguistically and
psychologically reiterating to me it's my
land, so nothing you do or invest in is going to matter or be safe
from my arbitrary whims. That's fine, but you don't get to retain
your skepticism for my aims or good will when I offer it freely or am
willing to bind myself to a contract. I want checks on my power and
reflection on my aims. You either don't give yourself the power, and
thus don't claim the responsibility, or aim at dumb shit.
If
what you're accepting about yourself leaves you complacent in what
you're willing to discuss or examine, you haven't accepted anything.
You've punted your obligation and likely adopted some posture about
how busy you are. You've probably reflexively found a way to
recognize the faults in others that you can't imagine manifest in
you. It's precisely because I am an intractable cunt with an
extremely, aberrant, loud mouth and fluidity to his inappropriateness
that I've been driven to the desire for an exacting conversation
about the forces at play and who is using them. I get snippets of
resonant and compelling moments. I get glimpses into the people I
wish you were and the person I want to be. But I didn't build my
house, start my businesses, or take a chance in my relationships
because I lacked a
direction or ideal I wished to embody. I don't find patience, and
healthy skepticism, or respectful deference from listening only to
the feverishly antagonistic demons that foresee and enact every
catastrophic end drawn from inferences of your every utterance.
I
have everything. My brain works. I'm full. I laugh hard and make
jokes. I study. I work on things that are easy for me and hard for
others so that maybe they can be free to better handle hard things I
can't help them with. I can't recognize the “love” you don't
demonstrate. I can't respect negligently wasting power you wish you
had, and do have, especially if I show you how it works or give you
the opportunity to do the same kind of work I had to do in order to
be the one presenting the opportunity. I don't resent people with
something to teach me nor am I only willing to learn something on my
own terms. I can only work with what's on offer.
I'm offering
you 921 insights into my head, 5 acres, my tools, my back, my
efficiency, my experience in high stress and high responsibility
environments, and my spirit and style of engaging with the world. And
who am I to pretend that you want or need any of that, right? Save
the handful of my regularly cited exemplars, what is it you think
you're offering me? A like? A follow? What are you offering “the
world?” Do you want to be just something I keep feeling good or
operating well-enough until you've exhausted your utility? Are you my
afterthoughts and naive idealism codified by the silence, our
histories incidental verses entwined?
I'll weather the scorn
or isolation, to be sure. Every shit example I set or shit “friend”
I've taken a chance on is quickly followed by the waterfall of
prosperity and better examples set by others. I need to maintain the
memory of the standards set by you,
not me, in how I've been treated. I have friends who don't judge me.
I have friends who laugh easy. I have friends who respect my time and
effort. I have friends who show up in emergencies. I have friends I
start businesses with. I have friends who demonstrate their grasp of
their own wickedness or sense of responsibility and maturity without
making it yours or my problem. The structure and system are there,
because again, I have everything. You find a way to vibe with that or
make peace with how you incorporate it, or not. If you're unworthy of
what's on offer, well, you're my mom lol.
No comments:
Post a Comment